PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.78%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 6.15%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
26.22%
Cost growth above 1.5x PANW's 11.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
13.07%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 4.25%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-3.99%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.42%
R&D reduction while PANW shows 6.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-15.89%
G&A reduction while PANW shows 12.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
26.76%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PANW's 2.91%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-1046.67%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 8.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
8.83%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 4.93%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
17.80%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PANW's 6.47%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
19.22%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x PANW's 1.67%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
19.27%
D&A growth above 1.5x PANW's 5.88%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
18.05%
EBITDA growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.30%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
17.72%
Operating income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.05%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.46%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 2.86%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
17.50%
Pre-tax income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
51.29%
Tax expense growth while PANW reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.59%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 1.94%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-6.10%
Net margin decline while PANW shows 7.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
10.96%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 4.35%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
11.11%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 4.35%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.44%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 1.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.58%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 1.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.