PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.45%
Revenue growth below 50% of PANW's 17.90%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
4.91%
Cost growth less than half of PANW's 11.96%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-1.92%
Gross profit decline while PANW shows 20.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.36%
Margin decline while PANW shows 2.02% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.74%
R&D growth above 1.5x PANW's 1.51%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
12.73%
G&A growth less than half of PANW's 47.18%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
12.50%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PANW's 8.15%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
42.50%
Other expenses growth 1.1-1.25x PANW's 38.10%. Bill Ackman would demand expense justification.
9.44%
Similar operating expenses growth to PANW's 11.39%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
7.23%
Total costs growth 50-75% of PANW's 11.54%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
7.55%
Interest expense change of 7.55% while PANW maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-4.48%
D&A reduction while PANW shows 10.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-6.90%
EBITDA decline while PANW shows 71.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.31%
EBITDA margin decline while PANW shows 79.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.72%
Operating income decline while PANW shows 44.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.08%
Operating margin decline while PANW shows 52.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-370.89%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 19.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-21.84%
Pre-tax income decline while PANW shows 42.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.19%
Pre-tax margin decline while PANW shows 51.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-160.20%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
18.72%
Net income growth 50-75% of PANW's 37.27%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
18.19%
Net margin growth below 50% of PANW's 46.80%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.31%
EPS growth 50-75% of PANW's 36.36%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
18.57%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of PANW's 36.36%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-0.13%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.09%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.