PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.24%
Positive growth while PANW shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.11%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 2.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
9.41%
Positive growth while PANW shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.97%
Margin expansion while PANW shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.71%
R&D growth less than half of PANW's 7.90%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-13.95%
G&A reduction while PANW shows 0.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-12.49%
Marketing expense reduction while PANW shows 5.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-69.57%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 65.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-7.30%
Operating expenses reduction while PANW shows 5.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.81%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 4.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.60%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x PANW's 1.61%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
6.66%
D&A growth less than half of PANW's 27.54%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
19.48%
EBITDA growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
27.09%
EBITDA margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
44.62%
Operating income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.42%
Operating margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
127.46%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 54.55%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
43.99%
Pre-tax income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.82%
Pre-tax margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
245.45%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x PANW's 7.89%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
0.97%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.19%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.20%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.09%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.09%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.