PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.33%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
1.67%
Cost increase while PANW reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-5.72%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.48%
Margin decline while PANW shows 0.13% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.12%
R&D growth less than half of PANW's 2.81%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-9.60%
G&A reduction while PANW shows 35.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-13.91%
Marketing expense reduction while PANW shows 5.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
122.95%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 27.45%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-7.43%
Operating expenses reduction while PANW shows 8.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.93%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 5.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.30%
Interest expense growth less than half of PANW's 118.27%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
12.76%
Similar D&A growth to PANW's 14.44%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-7.76%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.70%
EBITDA margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.09%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.63%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.30%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.69%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.55%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.87%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.13%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 1.08% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.12%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 1.08% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.