PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.85%
Revenue decline while PANW shows 2.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-18.14%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 1.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
1.76%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of PANW's 2.58%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
8.09%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PANW's 0.40%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.04%
R&D growth 50-75% of PANW's 8.42%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
4.15%
G&A growth less than half of PANW's 16.01%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
-0.50%
Marketing expense reduction while PANW shows 5.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-52.94%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 13.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.76%
Operating expenses growth less than half of PANW's 7.65%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-8.93%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 5.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.15%
Interest expense reduction while PANW shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.30%
D&A reduction while PANW shows 3.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
0.11%
EBITDA growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.91%
EBITDA margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.81%
Operating income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.07%
Operating margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.17%
Other expenses growth less than half of PANW's 47.83%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
0.97%
Pre-tax income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.25%
Pre-tax margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-14.66%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
4.62%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.12%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.50%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.56%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.26%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.43% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.31%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.43% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.