PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.96%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-0.06%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 0.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.81%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.15%
R&D growth less than half of PANW's 7.44%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-25.54%
G&A reduction while PANW shows 0.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-12.60%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
85.12%
Other expenses change of 85.12% while PANW maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-8.60%
Operating expenses reduction while PANW shows 1.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.42%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 0.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.78%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.61%
D&A growth less than half of PANW's 28.91%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-3.29%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.86%
EBITDA margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.27%
Operating income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.31%
Operating margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 28.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.71%
Pre-tax income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.73%
Pre-tax margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
439.76%
Tax expense growth while PANW reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-19.03%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.40%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.60%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.30%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.27%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.94% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.26%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.84% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.