PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.65%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 5.80%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
18.76%
Cost growth above 1.5x PANW's 7.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
8.38%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 5.30%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-2.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.83%
R&D growth less than half of PANW's 8.74%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
5.66%
G&A growth 50-75% of PANW's 9.17%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
13.74%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PANW's 2.52%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-5.56%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
6.97%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x PANW's 5.03%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
12.99%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PANW's 5.57%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
2.67%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x PANW's 0.53%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
7.81%
Similar D&A growth to PANW's 8.64%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
9.18%
EBITDA growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.50%
Operating income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.93%
Operating margin decline while PANW shows 3.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.03%
Pre-tax income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
21.31%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 147.06%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
9.09%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.29%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.29%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.42%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.17%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 1.76% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.25%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 1.76% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.