PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.31%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-10.84%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
1.78%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x PANW's 1.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
4.19%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PANW's 1.71%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-5.52%
R&D reduction while PANW shows 9.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-32.43%
G&A reduction while PANW shows 22.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-21.89%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-16.37%
Operating expenses reduction while PANW shows 5.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-13.60%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 2.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.14%
Interest expense reduction while PANW shows 28.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.51%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.16%
EBITDA growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.63%
EBITDA margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.42%
Operating income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.22%
Operating margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1553.33%
Other expenses growth while PANW reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.13%
Pre-tax income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.97%
Pre-tax margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.50%
Tax expense growth while PANW reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.02%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
26.96%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.32%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.66%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.18%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.17%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.