PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
15.94%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 7.49%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
29.01%
Cost growth above 1.5x PANW's 10.73%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
10.44%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 6.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-4.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.55%
R&D reduction while PANW shows 12.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
1.79%
G&A growth less than half of PANW's 19.95%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
16.92%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PANW's 9.98%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.90%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of PANW's 11.98%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
18.33%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PANW's 11.63%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-3.06%
Interest expense reduction while PANW shows 1.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.39%
D&A growth less than half of PANW's 11.18%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
11.54%
EBITDA growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
12.73%
Operating income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
77.42%
Other expenses growth while PANW reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.72%
Pre-tax income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.91%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
28.82%
Tax expense growth 1.1-1.25x PANW's 24.24%. Bill Ackman would demand explanation.
11.30%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
11.41%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.54%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.15%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.42% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.27%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.42% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.