PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.18%
Revenue decline while PANW shows 5.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.09%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 7.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-0.77%
Gross profit decline while PANW shows 4.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.49%
Margin expansion while PANW shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.23%
R&D growth less than half of PANW's 16.61%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
16.51%
G&A growth while PANW reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
2.73%
Marketing expense growth 50-75% of PANW's 4.82%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
-91.43%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 300.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
5.72%
Similar operating expenses growth to PANW's 6.97%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-2.07%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 7.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.86%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x PANW's 0.74%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
6.34%
D&A growth less than half of PANW's 104.37%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-3.26%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.42%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.74%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-57.27%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 2.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.92%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.10%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.04%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.24%
Similar net margin growth to PANW's 3.44%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.21%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 1.04% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.25%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 1.04% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.