PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.81%
Revenue decline while PANW shows 2.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.47%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 6.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-1.52%
Gross profit decline while PANW shows 0.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.29%
Margin expansion while PANW shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.55%
R&D reduction while PANW shows 4.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-15.44%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-22.37%
Marketing expense reduction while PANW shows 3.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-72.73%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-12.50%
Operating expenses reduction while PANW shows 3.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.31%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 3.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.53%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.95%
D&A reduction while PANW shows 1.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
0.64%
EBITDA growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.36%
EBITDA margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.99%
Operating income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.94%
Operating margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-7.74%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 79.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.77%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of PANW's 10.85%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
7.72%
Pre-tax margin growth 50-75% of PANW's 12.86%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-99.36%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
24.59%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 13.16%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
26.89%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 15.12%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
24.66%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 14.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
24.88%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 14.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.19%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.41% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.18%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.45% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.