PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.36%
Revenue decline while PANW shows 0.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.95%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-2.16%
Gross profit decline while PANW shows 4.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.24%
Margin expansion below 50% of PANW's 3.23%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.23%
R&D reduction while PANW shows 2.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-20.07%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-18.69%
Marketing expense reduction while PANW shows 7.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-34.78%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-11.74%
Operating expenses reduction while PANW shows 4.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.70%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 0.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.81%
Interest expense growth while PANW reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-29.88%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-2.62%
EBITDA decline while PANW shows 236.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.97%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PANW's 351.20%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.79%
Operating income growth below 50% of PANW's 240.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.44%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PANW's 239.58%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
214.89%
Other expenses growth less than half of PANW's 910.53%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
5.30%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PANW's 98.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.96%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PANW's 97.20%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.18%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x PANW's 2.86%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
4.87%
Net income growth below 50% of PANW's 506.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.52%
Net margin growth below 50% of PANW's 501.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.91%
EPS growth below 50% of PANW's 614.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.38%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PANW's 512.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.23%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.28%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.62% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.