PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.17%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x PANW's 5.55%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
8.46%
Similar cost growth to PANW's 8.14%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
5.16%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x PANW's 4.64%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-0.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.94%
Similar R&D growth to PANW's 5.27%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
8.97%
G&A growth less than half of PANW's 57.42%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
12.65%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PANW's 5.30%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.34%
Similar operating expenses growth to PANW's 9.21%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
8.41%
Similar total costs growth to PANW's 8.89%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
2.06%
Interest expense growth less than half of PANW's 28.57%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-7.53%
D&A reduction while PANW shows 4.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-3.79%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.38%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.60%
Operating income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.42%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-708.48%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 2.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.99%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.16%
Tax expense reduction while PANW shows 221.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.27%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.41%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.12%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.03%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x PANW's 0.87%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.03%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.