PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.62%
Revenue growth below 50% of PANW's 1.40%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
0.55%
Cost growth less than half of PANW's 3.35%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
0.66%
Similar gross profit growth to PANW's 0.69%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
0.03%
Margin expansion while PANW shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.55%
R&D growth while PANW reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-4.72%
G&A reduction while PANW shows 6.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-3.54%
Marketing expense reduction while PANW shows 4.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.20%
Operating expenses reduction while PANW shows 2.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.23%
Total costs growth less than half of PANW's 2.64%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.02%
D&A growth above 1.5x PANW's 0.57%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
10.67%
EBITDA growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.98%
EBITDA margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.10%
Operating income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.47%
Operating margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
72.77%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 8.65%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
6.85%
Pre-tax income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.19%
Pre-tax margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.63%
Tax expense growth while PANW reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.12%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.45%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.10%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.12%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.01%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.88% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.09%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.