PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.24%
Revenue decline while PLTR shows 13.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
4.05%
Cost growth less than half of PLTR's 11.54%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-3.20%
Gross profit decline while PLTR shows 14.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.98%
Margin decline while PLTR shows 0.43% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
7.98%
R&D growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.56%
Operating expenses growth less than half of PLTR's 1.24%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
1.46%
Total costs growth less than half of PLTR's 3.75%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
102.09%
D&A growth while PLTR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.40%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PLTR's 81.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.23%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 60.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.14%
Operating income decline while PLTR shows 52.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.98%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 34.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.71%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 32.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.61%
Pre-tax income decline while PLTR shows 48.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.47%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 30.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.65%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-6.59%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 52.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.45%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 34.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.00%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 55.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.33%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 62.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.11%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.70%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.13%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.