PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.41%
Revenue decline while PLTR shows 13.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-9.65%
Cost reduction while PLTR shows 11.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-5.60%
Gross profit decline while PLTR shows 14.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.86%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.11%
R&D growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.96%
Operating expenses reduction while PLTR shows 1.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.45%
Total costs reduction while PLTR shows 3.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.83%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.17%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PLTR's 81.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.83%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 60.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.09%
Operating income growth below 50% of PLTR's 52.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
24.03%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of PLTR's 34.71%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
41.09%
Other expenses growth 1.1-1.25x PLTR's 32.97%. Bill Ackman would demand expense justification.
19.93%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PLTR's 48.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
28.14%
Similar pre-tax margin growth to PLTR's 30.98%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
19.93%
Tax expense growth while PLTR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.93%
Net income growth below 50% of PLTR's 52.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
28.14%
Similar net margin growth to PLTR's 34.43%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
19.05%
EPS growth below 50% of PLTR's 55.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.05%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PLTR's 62.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.37%
Share count reduction below 50% of PLTR's 0.70%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.15%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.40%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.