PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.26%
Similar revenue growth to PLTR's 13.56%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
59.00%
Cost growth above 1.5x PLTR's 11.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
0.03%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PLTR's 14.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.28%
Margin decline while PLTR shows 0.43% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.19%
R&D growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
133.33%
G&A growth while PLTR reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
39.59%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.16%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.62%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 1.24%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
33.70%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.73%
D&A growth while PLTR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-24.02%
EBITDA decline while PLTR shows 81.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.66%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 60.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.25%
Operating income decline while PLTR shows 52.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.12%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 34.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
33.90%
Similar other expenses growth to PLTR's 32.97%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-14.80%
Pre-tax income decline while PLTR shows 48.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.73%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 30.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.34%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-8.62%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 52.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.13%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 34.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.53%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 55.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.53%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 62.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.34%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.80%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.