PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.27%
Revenue decline while PLTR shows 13.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-40.38%
Cost reduction while PLTR shows 11.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
2.45%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PLTR's 14.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.68%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.63%
R&D reduction while PLTR shows 0.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-29.74%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-12.27%
Marketing expense reduction while PLTR shows 3.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.49%
Operating expenses reduction while PLTR shows 1.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.29%
Total costs reduction while PLTR shows 3.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.36%
D&A growth while PLTR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
26.12%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PLTR's 81.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
37.53%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of PLTR's 60.13%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
22.88%
Operating income growth below 50% of PLTR's 52.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
33.96%
Similar operating margin growth to PLTR's 34.71%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
21.87%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of PLTR's 32.97%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
23.15%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PLTR's 48.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
34.25%
Pre-tax margin growth 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 30.98%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
44.32%
Tax expense growth while PLTR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.85%
Net income growth below 50% of PLTR's 52.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.20%
Net margin growth 50-75% of PLTR's 34.43%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
17.65%
EPS growth below 50% of PLTR's 55.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.65%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PLTR's 62.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.11%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.70%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.08%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.