PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.59%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 13.56%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
58.38%
Cost growth above 1.5x PLTR's 11.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
15.95%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 14.05%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-6.19%
Margin decline while PLTR shows 0.43% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
84.42%
R&D growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.58%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 1.24%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
71.27%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.54%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-57.57%
EBITDA decline while PLTR shows 81.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-72.17%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 60.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-53.14%
Operating income decline while PLTR shows 52.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-62.09%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 34.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
11.16%
Other expenses growth less than half of PLTR's 32.97%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-40.73%
Pre-tax income decline while PLTR shows 48.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-52.05%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 30.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.71%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-40.74%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 52.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-52.05%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 34.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.67%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 55.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.67%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 62.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.01%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.13%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.40%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.