PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.63%
Revenue decline while PLTR shows 13.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-39.80%
Cost reduction while PLTR shows 11.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-0.58%
Gross profit decline while PLTR shows 14.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
10.02%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-48.23%
R&D reduction while PLTR shows 0.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
237.05%
G&A growth while PLTR reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-21.85%
Marketing expense reduction while PLTR shows 3.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.40%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 1.24%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-9.00%
Total costs reduction while PLTR shows 3.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.00%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-13.36%
EBITDA decline while PLTR shows 81.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.92%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 60.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.36%
Operating income decline while PLTR shows 52.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.12%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 34.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
19.59%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of PLTR's 32.97%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-1.43%
Pre-tax income decline while PLTR shows 48.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.08%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 30.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
26.34%
Tax expense growth while PLTR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-15.11%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 52.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.06%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 34.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.29%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 55.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.29%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 62.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.23%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.39%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.