503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.11%
Revenue decline while PLTR shows 13.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.13%
Cost reduction while PLTR shows 11.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-0.35%
Gross profit decline while PLTR shows 14.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.77%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-6.69%
R&D reduction while PLTR shows 0.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.29%
Operating expenses reduction while PLTR shows 1.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.53%
Total costs reduction while PLTR shows 3.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.78%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.51%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PLTR's 81.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.64%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 60.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.52%
Operating income growth below 50% of PLTR's 52.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.77%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 34.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-51.14%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 32.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.86%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PLTR's 48.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.00%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 30.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.78%
Tax expense growth while PLTR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.02%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 52.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.97%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 34.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.00%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 55.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.00%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 62.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.45%
Share count reduction below 50% of PLTR's 0.70%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.38%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PLTR's 0.40%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.