PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.07%
Revenue decline while PLTR shows 13.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-29.08%
Cost reduction while PLTR shows 11.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.18%
Gross profit decline while PLTR shows 14.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.38%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.94%
R&D growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
128.01%
G&A growth while PLTR reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-2.24%
Marketing expense reduction while PLTR shows 3.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.83%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 1.24%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
3.66%
Similar total costs growth to PLTR's 3.75%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
161.11%
D&A growth while PLTR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-29.90%
EBITDA decline while PLTR shows 81.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.13%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 60.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.90%
Operating income decline while PLTR shows 52.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.17%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 34.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
18.10%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of PLTR's 32.97%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-26.00%
Pre-tax income decline while PLTR shows 48.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.79%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 30.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.03%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-25.99%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 52.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.77%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 34.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.00%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 55.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.13%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 62.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.19%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.23%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.