PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.13%
Revenue decline while PLTR shows 13.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-11.13%
Cost reduction while PLTR shows 11.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-3.01%
Gross profit decline while PLTR shows 14.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.18%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-10.41%
R&D reduction while PLTR shows 0.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.91%
Operating expenses reduction while PLTR shows 1.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.59%
Total costs reduction while PLTR shows 3.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.02%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
35.36%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PLTR's 81.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
64.92%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to PLTR's 60.13%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
35.36%
Operating income growth 50-75% of PLTR's 52.98%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
41.20%
Operating margin growth 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 34.71%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-41.97%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 32.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
17.90%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PLTR's 48.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.98%
Pre-tax margin growth 50-75% of PLTR's 30.98%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
776.40%
Tax expense growth while PLTR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-15.11%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 52.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.45%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 34.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.71%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 55.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.71%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 62.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.49%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.46%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.