PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.92%
Revenue decline while PLTR shows 13.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-9.42%
Cost reduction while PLTR shows 11.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.56%
Gross profit decline while PLTR shows 14.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.38%
Similar margin change to PLTR's 0.43%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
1.63%
R&D growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
52.04%
G&A growth while PLTR reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-12.16%
Marketing expense reduction while PLTR shows 3.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.87%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of PLTR's 1.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-2.34%
Total costs reduction while PLTR shows 3.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.38%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-16.51%
EBITDA decline while PLTR shows 81.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.40%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 60.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.51%
Operating income decline while PLTR shows 52.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.34%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 34.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.04%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 32.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.00%
Pre-tax income decline while PLTR shows 48.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.78%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 30.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.84%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-18.51%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 52.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.50%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 34.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.14%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 55.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.71%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 62.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.43%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.10%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.