PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.29%
Revenue growth 50-75% of PLTR's 13.56%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
5.03%
Cost growth less than half of PLTR's 11.54%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
9.04%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of PLTR's 14.05%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
0.69%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
15.09%
R&D growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while PLTR shows 3.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.23%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 1.24%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
12.99%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.46%
D&A growth while PLTR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.53%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PLTR's 81.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.64%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 60.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.18%
Operating income decline while PLTR shows 52.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.82%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 34.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.71%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 32.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.32%
Pre-tax income decline while PLTR shows 48.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.88%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 30.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.88%
Tax expense growth while PLTR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.01%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 52.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.28%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 34.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.45%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 55.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.45%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 62.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.11%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.65%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.