PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.01%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 13.56%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
113.44%
Cost growth above 1.5x PLTR's 11.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-2.12%
Gross profit decline while PLTR shows 14.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-15.63%
Margin decline while PLTR shows 0.43% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-8.34%
R&D reduction while PLTR shows 0.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
22.59%
G&A growth while PLTR reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
36.88%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.16%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.43%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 1.24%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
43.13%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.59%
D&A growth while PLTR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-22.40%
EBITDA decline while PLTR shows 81.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.32%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 60.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.40%
Operating income decline while PLTR shows 52.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.11%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 34.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.27%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 32.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.52%
Pre-tax income decline while PLTR shows 48.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.94%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 30.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.57%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-24.50%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 52.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.92%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 34.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.86%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 55.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.71%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 62.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.24%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.68%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.