PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.13%
Revenue decline while PLTR shows 13.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
51.26%
Cost growth above 1.5x PLTR's 11.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-17.33%
Gross profit decline while PLTR shows 14.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-10.98%
Margin decline while PLTR shows 0.43% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
11.31%
R&D growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while PLTR shows 3.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.40%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 1.24%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
20.14%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.38%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-39.46%
EBITDA decline while PLTR shows 81.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.23%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 60.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-39.46%
Operating income decline while PLTR shows 52.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.81%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 34.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.77%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 32.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-38.55%
Pre-tax income decline while PLTR shows 48.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.83%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 30.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.92%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-38.39%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 52.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.66%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 34.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-37.25%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 55.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.00%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 62.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.26%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.86%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.