PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.93%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 13.56%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
32.45%
Cost growth above 1.5x PLTR's 11.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
15.67%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 14.05%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-2.74%
Margin decline while PLTR shows 0.43% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.61%
R&D growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
48.47%
G&A growth while PLTR reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
29.76%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.16%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.71%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 1.24%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
26.03%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.57%
D&A growth while PLTR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.51%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PLTR's 81.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.77%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 60.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.51%
Operating income growth below 50% of PLTR's 52.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.92%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 34.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
13.76%
Other expenses growth less than half of PLTR's 32.97%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
9.72%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PLTR's 48.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.75%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 30.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.65%
Tax expense growth while PLTR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.75%
Net income growth below 50% of PLTR's 52.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.72%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 34.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.70%
EPS growth below 50% of PLTR's 55.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.11%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PLTR's 62.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.20%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.11%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.