PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.41%
Similar revenue growth to PLTR's 13.56%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
37.18%
Cost growth above 1.5x PLTR's 11.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
4.17%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PLTR's 14.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.65%
Margin decline while PLTR shows 0.43% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.31%
R&D growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-6.31%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
20.30%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.16%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.16%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 1.24%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
17.97%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.03%
D&A growth while PLTR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.00%
EBITDA decline while PLTR shows 81.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.13%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 60.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.00%
Operating income decline while PLTR shows 52.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.34%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 34.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3662.50%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 32.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.89%
Pre-tax income decline while PLTR shows 48.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.77%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 30.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.52%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-4.55%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 52.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.55%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 34.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.08%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 55.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.08%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 62.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.99%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.93%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.