PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-17.93%
Revenue decline while PLTR shows 13.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-27.98%
Cost reduction while PLTR shows 11.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-14.84%
Gross profit decline while PLTR shows 14.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.76%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-3.41%
R&D reduction while PLTR shows 0.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
44.77%
G&A growth while PLTR reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-18.60%
Marketing expense reduction while PLTR shows 3.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.71%
Operating expenses reduction while PLTR shows 1.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-13.84%
Total costs reduction while PLTR shows 3.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.06%
D&A growth while PLTR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-25.27%
EBITDA decline while PLTR shows 81.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.24%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 60.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.27%
Operating income decline while PLTR shows 52.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.95%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 34.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.90%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 32.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-28.17%
Pre-tax income decline while PLTR shows 48.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.48%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 30.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.71%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-28.68%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 52.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.10%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 34.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.79%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 55.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.79%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 62.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.13%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.11%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.