PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-23.76%
Revenue decline while PLTR shows 13.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-24.06%
Cost reduction while PLTR shows 11.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-23.68%
Gross profit decline while PLTR shows 14.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.09%
Margin expansion below 50% of PLTR's 0.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.78%
R&D growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-2.62%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-11.49%
Marketing expense reduction while PLTR shows 3.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.45%
Operating expenses reduction while PLTR shows 1.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.22%
Total costs reduction while PLTR shows 3.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.85%
D&A growth while PLTR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-36.32%
EBITDA decline while PLTR shows 81.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.61%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 60.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-39.23%
Operating income decline while PLTR shows 52.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.30%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 34.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-54.59%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 32.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-39.87%
Pre-tax income decline while PLTR shows 48.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.14%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 30.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-39.89%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-39.87%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 52.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.13%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 34.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.67%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 55.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-39.19%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 62.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.00%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.84%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.