PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-17.67%
Revenue decline while PLTR shows 13.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-19.37%
Cost reduction while PLTR shows 11.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-17.12%
Gross profit decline while PLTR shows 14.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.66%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3.84%
R&D growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
22.75%
G&A growth while PLTR reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-11.29%
Marketing expense reduction while PLTR shows 3.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.91%
Operating expenses reduction while PLTR shows 1.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.07%
Total costs reduction while PLTR shows 3.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
16.67%
Interest expense change of 16.67% while PLTR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
8.60%
D&A growth while PLTR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-38.16%
EBITDA decline while PLTR shows 81.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.80%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 60.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.08%
Operating income decline while PLTR shows 52.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.08%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 34.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.82%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 32.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-29.09%
Pre-tax income decline while PLTR shows 48.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.88%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 30.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-57.43%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-21.13%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 52.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.21%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 34.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.51%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 55.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.78%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 62.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.91%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.70%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.