PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
20.22%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 13.56%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
49.27%
Cost growth above 1.5x PLTR's 11.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
12.15%
Similar gross profit growth to PLTR's 14.05%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-6.71%
Margin decline while PLTR shows 0.43% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.80%
R&D growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-3.70%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
29.72%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.16%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
1350.00%
Other expenses change of 1350.00% while PLTR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
13.47%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 1.24%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
26.77%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
1.06%
Interest expense change of 1.06% while PLTR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-6.61%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
10.90%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PLTR's 81.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.46%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 60.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
10.98%
Operating income growth below 50% of PLTR's 52.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.69%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 34.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
137.86%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 32.97%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
12.77%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PLTR's 48.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.20%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 30.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.00%
Tax expense growth while PLTR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.44%
Net income growth below 50% of PLTR's 52.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.98%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 34.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
16.18%
EPS growth below 50% of PLTR's 55.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.71%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PLTR's 62.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.12%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.70%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.29%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.