PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.65%
Revenue decline while PLTR shows 13.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-29.90%
Cost reduction while PLTR shows 11.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-11.75%
Gross profit decline while PLTR shows 14.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.88%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.16%
R&D growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
2.68%
G&A growth while PLTR reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-9.25%
Marketing expense reduction while PLTR shows 3.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-140.00%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-2.37%
Operating expenses reduction while PLTR shows 1.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.41%
Total costs reduction while PLTR shows 3.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.98%
D&A growth while PLTR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-19.84%
EBITDA decline while PLTR shows 81.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.06%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 60.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.27%
Operating income decline while PLTR shows 52.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.33%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 34.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-104.49%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 32.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-22.77%
Pre-tax income decline while PLTR shows 48.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.34%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 30.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.29%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-22.89%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 52.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.48%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 34.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.78%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 55.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.08%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 62.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.01%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.39%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PLTR's 0.40%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.