PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.75%
Revenue growth below 50% of PLTR's 13.56%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
5.34%
Cost growth less than half of PLTR's 11.54%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
3.28%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PLTR's 14.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.45%
Margin decline while PLTR shows 0.43% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.06%
R&D growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-1.22%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
10.75%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.16%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
935.00%
Other expenses change of 935.00% while PLTR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
6.07%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 1.24%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
5.81%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while PLTR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.05%
D&A growth while PLTR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-74.07%
EBITDA decline while PLTR shows 81.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.80%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 60.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-96.99%
Operating income decline while PLTR shows 52.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-97.10%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 34.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1618.18%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 32.97%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-94.36%
Pre-tax income decline while PLTR shows 48.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-94.56%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 30.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.19%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-109.63%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 52.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-109.28%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 34.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-109.62%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 55.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-109.78%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 62.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.15%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.29%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.