PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
34.03%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 13.56%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
36.56%
Cost growth above 1.5x PLTR's 11.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
33.14%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 14.05%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.66%
Margin decline while PLTR shows 0.43% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.76%
R&D growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
2.57%
G&A growth while PLTR reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
46.32%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.16%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-116.34%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
22.37%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 1.24%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
27.90%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
10.53%
Interest expense change of 10.53% while PLTR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
42.11%
D&A growth while PLTR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
40.15%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PLTR's 81.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.92%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 60.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
46.40%
Similar operating income growth to PLTR's 52.98%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
9.23%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 34.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-100.44%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 32.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
40.40%
Similar pre-tax income growth to PLTR's 48.74%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
4.75%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 30.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.43%
Tax expense growth while PLTR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
42.79%
Similar net income growth to PLTR's 52.65%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
6.53%
Net margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 34.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
43.40%
Similar EPS growth to PLTR's 55.56%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
43.40%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of PLTR's 62.50%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-0.04%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.59%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.