PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.51%
Revenue decline while PLTR shows 13.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-15.90%
Cost reduction while PLTR shows 11.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-0.39%
Gross profit decline while PLTR shows 14.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.31%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.43%
R&D growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
43.25%
G&A growth while PLTR reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-11.95%
Marketing expense reduction while PLTR shows 3.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-142.42%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
1.21%
Similar operating expenses growth to PLTR's 1.24%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-5.90%
Total costs reduction while PLTR shows 3.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.81%
Interest expense change of 3.81% while PLTR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
4.36%
D&A growth while PLTR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.34%
EBITDA decline while PLTR shows 81.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.78%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 60.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.05%
Operating income decline while PLTR shows 52.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.58%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 34.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-800.00%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 32.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.15%
Pre-tax income decline while PLTR shows 48.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.47%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 30.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.13%
Tax expense growth while PLTR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.05%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 52.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.57%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 34.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.26%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 55.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.26%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 62.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.35%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.18%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.