503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.89%
Revenue decline while PLTR shows 13.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
17.03%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 11.54%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
-8.97%
Gross profit decline while PLTR shows 14.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-6.25%
Margin decline while PLTR shows 0.43% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.42%
R&D growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-26.93%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
11.44%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.16%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
231.25%
Other expenses change of 231.25% while PLTR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
1.62%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 1.24%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
7.35%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
10.09%
Interest expense change of 10.09% while PLTR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-6.65%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-17.31%
EBITDA decline while PLTR shows 81.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.10%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 60.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.22%
Operating income decline while PLTR shows 52.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.84%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 34.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
900.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 32.97%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-19.18%
Pre-tax income decline while PLTR shows 48.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.77%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 30.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.77%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-18.00%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 52.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.56%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 34.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.06%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 55.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.06%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 62.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.23%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.15%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.40%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.