PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.87%
Revenue decline while PLTR shows 13.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.16%
Cost reduction while PLTR shows 11.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-6.37%
Gross profit decline while PLTR shows 14.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.54%
Margin expansion 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 0.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-0.57%
R&D reduction while PLTR shows 0.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-19.09%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-21.85%
Marketing expense reduction while PLTR shows 3.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-23.81%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-14.24%
Operating expenses reduction while PLTR shows 1.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.78%
Total costs reduction while PLTR shows 3.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.67%
Interest expense reduction while PLTR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.95%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-0.08%
EBITDA decline while PLTR shows 81.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
10.48%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 60.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.30%
Operating income growth below 50% of PLTR's 52.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.99%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 34.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.78%
Other expenses growth less than half of PLTR's 32.97%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
4.28%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PLTR's 48.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.97%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 30.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.36%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
5.62%
Net income growth below 50% of PLTR's 52.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.41%
Net margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 34.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.78%
EPS growth below 50% of PLTR's 55.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.08%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PLTR's 62.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.07%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.09%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.