PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
32.33%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 13.56%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
61.75%
Cost growth above 1.5x PLTR's 11.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
21.02%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 14.05%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-8.55%
Margin decline while PLTR shows 0.43% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.69%
R&D reduction while PLTR shows 0.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
22.27%
G&A growth while PLTR reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
29.63%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.16%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-238.75%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
16.71%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 1.24%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
35.71%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.41%
Interest expense change of 14.41% while PLTR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
32.18%
D&A growth while PLTR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.04%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PLTR's 81.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.47%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 60.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
25.81%
Operating income growth below 50% of PLTR's 52.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.92%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 34.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-222.97%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 32.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
22.94%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PLTR's 48.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.09%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 30.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
13.40%
Tax expense growth while PLTR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
25.06%
Net income growth below 50% of PLTR's 52.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.49%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 34.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
25.40%
EPS growth below 50% of PLTR's 55.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.81%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PLTR's 62.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.16%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.46%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.