PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.60%
Similar revenue growth to PLTR's 13.56%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
27.05%
Cost growth above 1.5x PLTR's 11.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
9.44%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of PLTR's 14.05%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-4.50%
Margin decline while PLTR shows 0.43% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
13.85%
R&D growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
17.75%
G&A growth while PLTR reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
32.19%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.16%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
8.33%
Other expenses change of 8.33% while PLTR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
23.18%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 1.24%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
24.90%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-3.43%
Interest expense reduction while PLTR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
38.80%
D&A growth while PLTR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.71%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PLTR's 81.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-11.37%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 60.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.05%
Operating income decline while PLTR shows 52.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.90%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 34.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
658.82%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 32.97%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-5.46%
Pre-tax income decline while PLTR shows 48.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.51%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 30.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
51.50%
Tax expense growth while PLTR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-18.52%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 52.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.90%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 34.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.65%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 55.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.12%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 62.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.46%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.26%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.