PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.77%
Revenue decline while PLTR shows 13.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
8.93%
Similar cost growth to PLTR's 11.54%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
-5.44%
Gross profit decline while PLTR shows 14.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.70%
Margin decline while PLTR shows 0.43% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.86%
R&D reduction while PLTR shows 0.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-16.17%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-20.38%
Marketing expense reduction while PLTR shows 3.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
46.97%
Other expenses change of 46.97% while PLTR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-13.45%
Operating expenses reduction while PLTR shows 1.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.31%
Total costs reduction while PLTR shows 3.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.73%
Interest expense reduction while PLTR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.03%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-11.82%
EBITDA decline while PLTR shows 81.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.90%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 60.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.84%
Operating income decline while PLTR shows 52.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.14%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 34.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-45.26%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 32.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.35%
Pre-tax income decline while PLTR shows 48.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.65%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 30.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.99%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.56%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 52.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.79%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 34.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.79%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 55.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.82%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 62.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.04%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.70%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.07%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.40%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.