PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-17.91%
Revenue decline while PLTR shows 13.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-29.35%
Cost reduction while PLTR shows 11.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-10.81%
Gross profit decline while PLTR shows 14.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
8.65%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.79%
R&D growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-0.55%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-14.04%
Marketing expense reduction while PLTR shows 3.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
87.08%
Other expenses change of 87.08% while PLTR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-6.39%
Operating expenses reduction while PLTR shows 1.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.00%
Total costs reduction while PLTR shows 3.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
30.25%
Interest expense change of 30.25% while PLTR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-0.39%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-13.53%
EBITDA decline while PLTR shows 81.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.99%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 60.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-15.20%
Operating income decline while PLTR shows 52.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.30%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 34.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-204.05%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 32.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.98%
Pre-tax income decline while PLTR shows 48.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.13%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 30.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-22.90%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-14.98%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 52.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.58%
Net margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 34.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-14.08%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 55.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.08%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 62.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.74%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.72%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.