PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.08%
Revenue growth below 50% of PLTR's 13.56%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
4.29%
Cost growth less than half of PLTR's 11.54%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
0.99%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PLTR's 14.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.06%
Margin decline while PLTR shows 0.43% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.69%
R&D growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
16.59%
G&A growth while PLTR reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
6.79%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.16%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
114.81%
Other expenses change of 114.81% while PLTR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
6.98%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 1.24%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
5.69%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
17.06%
Interest expense change of 17.06% while PLTR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-1.45%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-100.19%
EBITDA decline while PLTR shows 81.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.65%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 60.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-131.13%
Operating income decline while PLTR shows 52.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-130.50%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 34.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
485.71%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 32.97%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-126.94%
Pre-tax income decline while PLTR shows 48.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-126.40%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 30.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.07%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-164.09%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 52.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-162.79%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 34.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-165.57%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 55.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-165.57%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 62.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.30%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.14%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.