PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.12%
Revenue decline while PLTR shows 13.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-3.49%
Cost reduction while PLTR shows 11.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-10.47%
Gross profit decline while PLTR shows 14.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.56%
Margin decline while PLTR shows 0.43% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.27%
R&D reduction while PLTR shows 0.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-14.78%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-15.85%
Marketing expense reduction while PLTR shows 3.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-2425.00%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-11.38%
Operating expenses reduction while PLTR shows 1.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.65%
Total costs reduction while PLTR shows 3.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.81%
Interest expense change of 0.81% while PLTR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-2.14%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
36306.25%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 81.84%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.12%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 60.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
382.17%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 52.98%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
407.11%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 34.71%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-194.28%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 32.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
413.95%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 48.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
441.70%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 30.98%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-57.54%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
253.43%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 52.65%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
266.99%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 34.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
252.50%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 55.56%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
252.50%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 62.50%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.81%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.29%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PLTR's 0.40%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.