PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.37%
Revenue growth below 50% of PLTR's 13.56%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-1.69%
Cost reduction while PLTR shows 11.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
11.47%
Similar gross profit growth to PLTR's 14.05%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
4.79%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.27%
R&D reduction while PLTR shows 0.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-19.68%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-19.51%
Marketing expense reduction while PLTR shows 3.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
61.54%
Other expenses change of 61.54% while PLTR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-12.74%
Operating expenses reduction while PLTR shows 1.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.37%
Total costs reduction while PLTR shows 3.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
26.67%
Interest expense change of 26.67% while PLTR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-4.92%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
52.28%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of PLTR's 81.84%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
32.09%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of PLTR's 60.13%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
118.02%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 52.98%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
104.96%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 34.71%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-58.05%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 32.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
103.97%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 48.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
91.75%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 30.98%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
415.56%
Tax expense growth while PLTR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
81.52%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 52.65%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
70.64%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 34.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
82.50%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 55.56%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
84.62%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 62.50%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-0.68%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.67%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.