PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.45%
Revenue growth below 50% of PLTR's 13.56%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
4.91%
Cost growth less than half of PLTR's 11.54%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-1.92%
Gross profit decline while PLTR shows 14.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.36%
Margin decline while PLTR shows 0.43% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.74%
R&D growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
12.73%
G&A growth while PLTR reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
12.50%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.16%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
42.50%
Other expenses change of 42.50% while PLTR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
9.44%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 1.24%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
7.23%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
7.55%
Interest expense change of 7.55% while PLTR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-4.48%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-6.90%
EBITDA decline while PLTR shows 81.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.31%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 60.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.72%
Operating income decline while PLTR shows 52.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.08%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 34.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-370.89%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 32.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-21.84%
Pre-tax income decline while PLTR shows 48.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.19%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 30.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-160.20%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
18.72%
Net income growth below 50% of PLTR's 52.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.19%
Net margin growth 50-75% of PLTR's 34.43%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
18.31%
EPS growth below 50% of PLTR's 55.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.57%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PLTR's 62.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.13%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.09%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.