PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.85%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 13.56%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
33.66%
Cost growth above 1.5x PLTR's 11.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
9.80%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of PLTR's 14.05%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-6.83%
Margin decline while PLTR shows 0.43% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.96%
R&D reduction while PLTR shows 0.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-4.89%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
19.67%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.16%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
187.18%
Other expenses change of 187.18% while PLTR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
7.28%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 1.24%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
20.26%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
3.87%
Interest expense change of 3.87% while PLTR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
1.48%
D&A growth while PLTR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.88%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PLTR's 81.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.07%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 60.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
12.60%
Operating income growth below 50% of PLTR's 52.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.46%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 34.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
77.54%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 32.97%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
14.84%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PLTR's 48.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.55%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 30.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
998.79%
Tax expense growth while PLTR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-195.83%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 52.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-181.32%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 34.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-196.47%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 55.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-197.62%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 62.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.03%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.70%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-1.14%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.