PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.26%
Revenue decline while PLTR shows 13.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-16.22%
Cost reduction while PLTR shows 11.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-1.70%
Gross profit decline while PLTR shows 14.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.99%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.02%
R&D growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
8.93%
G&A growth while PLTR reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-4.98%
Marketing expense reduction while PLTR shows 3.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-79.41%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
0.90%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of PLTR's 1.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-8.46%
Total costs reduction while PLTR shows 3.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.00%
Interest expense reduction while PLTR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.86%
D&A growth while PLTR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.90%
EBITDA decline while PLTR shows 81.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.04%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 60.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.46%
Operating income decline while PLTR shows 52.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.02%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 34.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-28.78%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 32.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.76%
Pre-tax income decline while PLTR shows 48.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.62%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 30.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-92.13%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
217.80%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 52.65%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
227.02%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 34.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
217.07%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 55.56%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
215.85%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 62.50%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.16%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
1.09%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PLTR's 0.40%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.