PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.18%
Similar revenue growth to PLTR's 13.56%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
5.10%
Cost growth less than half of PLTR's 11.54%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
15.91%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 14.05%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
3.33%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
5.87%
R&D growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
5.22%
G&A growth while PLTR reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
9.80%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.16%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-971.43%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
7.63%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 1.24%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
6.36%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-2.75%
Interest expense reduction while PLTR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.16%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
26.05%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PLTR's 81.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.24%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 60.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
25.17%
Operating income growth below 50% of PLTR's 52.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.58%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 34.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-13.75%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 32.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
23.60%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PLTR's 48.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.18%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 30.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
48.48%
Tax expense growth while PLTR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.52%
Net income growth below 50% of PLTR's 52.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.54%
Net margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 34.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.79%
EPS growth below 50% of PLTR's 55.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PLTR's 62.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.19%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.24%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.